Welcome to the Office of Solicitor General e-Library

The OSG e-Library is a comprehensive digital platform dedicated to the collection, preservation, and dissemination of critical legal information. It serves as an essential resource for legal research in civil litigation, equipping users with timely and relevant legal updates through the Current Awareness Service (CAS). Additionally, it enriches the legal repository with a wide range of e-publications, including constitutions, statutes, and other pivotal legal documents, ensuring seamless access to authoritative legal resources.

Legal Clusters

CASE SUMMARYFLY NOTEJUDGMENTSLEGISLATIONSPOLICY AND GUIDELINESOSG - STATE ATTORNEY'S TRAINING: PRESENTATIONS

Special Collections

OSG SPECIAL COLLECTIONGOVERNMENT GAZETTEOSG PUBLICATIONSGALLERY

Browse Contents by Alphabet

Click a letter to see all contents whose title starts with it.

Recent Submissions

  • Thumbnail Image
    Item type:Item, Access status: Open Access ,
    EQUITY BANK TANZANIA LIMITED v. TSN OIL (TANZANIA) LIMITED, CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1413 OF 2024
    (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, 2023-11-03) Nangela, J.
    Braeburn Schools Tanzania Limited v. Zephania Samwel Civil Appeal No. 48 of 2023 [2025] TZCA 797
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item type:Item, Access status: Open Access ,
    ELIAHU LONYAMALI v. MOSSES LONYAMALI, CIVIL APPEAL NO. 269 OF 2023.
    (GOVERNMENT PRINTER, 2020-11-26) Sehel, J.A.
    As a general rule, in Civil matters, the trial court is required to base its decision on framed issues
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item type:Item, Access status: Open Access ,
    COCA-COLA KWANZA LIMITED V COMMISSIONER GENERAL, TANZANIA REVENUE AUTHORITY, CIVIL APPEAL NO. 208 OF 2025.
    (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, 2020-07-30) W. B. KOROSSO
    Mere conclusions on the decision without a thorough evaluation of the evidence were insufficient.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item type:Item, Access status: Open Access ,
    CHARLES KATELEBE MUTOKA V EDWARD W. K. BEJUMULA & OTHERS, CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 326/17 OF 2023.
    (GOVERNMENT PRINTER, 2021-09-30) KITUSI. J.A
    The 1st & 2nd Respondents failed or neglected to take essential steps in furtherance of their intended appeal.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item type:Item, Access status: Open Access ,
    ARUSHA BLOOMS LIMITED (UNDER RECEIVERSHIP) AND ANOTHER v. TIB DEVELOPMENT BANK LIMITED AND TWO OTHERS, CIVIL APPEAL NO. 154 of 2015.
    (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, 2019-10-31) LILA. J.A.
    There is a clear confusion regarding the correct date of the High Court ruling, which directly affects the calculation of the time limit for filing the notice of appeal.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item type:Item, Access status: Open Access ,
    AMINA SWALEHE MOLEL v. FARID HASAN HAJI, CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 987 OF 2025.
    (GOVERNMENT PRINTER, 2024-10-15) KITUSI, J.A.
    The intended appeal has already been lodged by the Respondent since 27/12/2024.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item type:Item, Access status: Open Access ,
    AMANA BANK LTD v. AUWSA AND 2 OTHERS, CIVIL APPEAL NO. 140 OF 2024
    (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, 2016-10-25) NDIKA. J.A
    The Court held that exact wording in a demand guarantee is not necessary so long as the demand conveys the substantive meaning required under the guarantee.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item type:Item, Access status: Open Access ,
    ALLY AHMED MWERANI v. NATIONAL MICROFINACE BANK (NMB PLC), CIVIL APPEAL NO. 933 OF 2025.
    (GOVERNMENT PRINTER, 2025-03-05) MKUYE, J.A.,
    The court held that the disciplinary hearing is internal process by the employer governed by Rule 13 of the Code of Good Practice and the CMA proceedings as a quasi-judicial tribunal conducts a fresh hearing and that CMA is not an appellate body reviewing disciplinary hearing.
    •