Now showing items 1-20 of 38

    • SILIMA VUAI FOUM. VS REGISTRAR OF CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND 3 OTHERS 

      JUSTICE OF APPEAL, LUBUVA, J.A.:; LUBUVA, OMAR, J.A., J.A. (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, ZANZIBAR., 1994-11-28)
      Before the High Court o Zanzibar, the appellant filed a chamber application seeking to move the court to order the first respondent, the registrar of cooperative societies in Zanzibar to make available to the appellant the ...
    • IGNAZIO MESSINA V.S WILLOW INVESTMENTS SPRL 

      JUSTICE OF APPEAL, LUGANGIRA, J.A; MAKAME, RAMADHANI, J.A.: J.A (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2002-02-27)
      In the course of arguing civil appeal no. 105 of 1998, learned counsel for the appellants Mr Lameck Mfalila, made a passionate to the court.
    • D.B.SHAPRIYA & CO. LTD. VS. BISH INTERNATIONAL B.V. 

      JUSTICE OF APPEAL, RAMADHANI, J.A.:; JUSTICE OF APPEAL, MSUMI, J.K. (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2002-08-22)
      The application files c notice of motion seeking to stay the execution of the decision of MSUMI, J.K. The respondent countered that by missing a preliminary objection that the affidavit filed by the applicant contravenes ...
    • JUMA S. BUSIYAH V.S THE ZONAL MANAGE, (SOUTH) TANZANIA POST CORPORATION. 

      JUSTICE OF APPEAL, MUNUO, J.A (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, MBEYA., 2005-05-04)
      The applicant, Juma S. Busiyah, through the services of Mr. Mushokorwa, learned advocate seeks, Extension of time to appeal to the Court of Appeal of Tanzania out of time, Leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal of Tanzania ...
    • SIMPLISIUS FELIX KIJUU ISSAKA VS. THE NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE LIMITED 

      JUSTICE OF APPEAL, KAJI, J.A.:; JUSTICE OF APPEAL, Dr. Bwana, J. (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2005-08-19)
      In this application, Simplisius Felix Kijuu Issaka,is applying for stay of execution of the decree of the High Court Commercial Division (Dr. Bwana, J.) in Commercial Case No. 175 of 2002, pending 24.3.2003 which was ...
    • VIP ENGINEERING AND MARKETING LTD VS SGS SOCIETE GENERALE DE SURVEILLANCE SA AND SGS TANZANIA SUPERINTENDENCE COMPANY LTD. 

      JUSTICE OF APPEAL, KAJI, J. A.,; JUSTICE OF APPEAL, Kimalo, J. (IN THE MATTER OF CIVIL APPEAL NO. 65 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 105 OF 2006 ., 2006-12-18)
      By notice of motion filed under Rules 45 (1) and 82 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 1979, the applicant, V.I.P. Engineering and Court of Appeal Rules, Marketing LTD, is moving the Court for an order to ...
    • MSASANI PENINSULA HOTELS LIMITED AND 6 OTHERS VS. BARCLAYS BANK TANZANIA LIMITED AND 2 OTHERS. 

      JUSTICE OF APPEAL, NSEKELA. J.A.:; JUSTICE OF APPEAL, Luanda., J. (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2007-03-23)
      The seven applicants lodged a notice of motion under Rule 3(2) (a) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 1979 and section 4 of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act, Cap. 141 (RE 2002) .
    • WILFRED MUGANYIZI RWAKATARE VS. HAMIS SUED KAGASHEKI AND HON. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. 

      JUSTICE OF APPEAL, MUNUO, J.A.:; JUSTICE OF APPEAL, Lila, J. (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2009-03-02)
      During the Parliamentary Elections in 2005, the present appellant, Mr. Wilfred Muganyizi Rwakatare, contested the Bukoba Urban District Constituency under the sponsorship of CUF. The first respondent, Mr. Hamisi Sued ...
    • KIDODI SUGAR ESTATE AND 5 OTHERS VS.TANGA PETROLEUM CO LTD . 

      JUSTICE OF APPEAL, KILEO, J.A. (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2011-07-02)
      The applicants, Kidodi Suga, Estate and five others who are represented by Mr. Charles Semgalawe, learned advocate, are seeking an extension of time within which to serve notice of appeal, proceedings and ...
    • THE GOVERNMENT OF THE GREAT SOCIALIST PEOPLES LIBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA & ANOTHER VS. THE HON. ATTORNEY GENERAL 

      JUSTICE OF APPEAL, KALEGEYA, J. A.:; JUSTICE OF APPEAL, Karua, J. (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA,DAR ES SALAAM., 2011-07-12)
      The said notice of motion is supported by an affidavit of Mr. Chidowu, Principal State Attorney, who also represented the Applicants during the hearing of the application.
    • LAZARUS MIRISHO MAFIE AND M/S SHIDOLYA TOURS & SAFARIS V.S ODILO GASPER KILENGA Alias MOISO GASPER. 

      JUSTICE OF APPEAL, MAKARAMBA, J.A (N THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (COMMERCIAL DIVISION) AT ARUSHA., 2011-08-29)
      This is a ruling on a preliminary objection on a point of law the Defendant's Counsel, Mr. Albert Msando raised in this Court on the 27 day of May 2010 in the course of hearing of this suit that some e-mail the ...
    • RUSTAMALI SHIVJI KARIM MERANI VS. KAMAL BHUSHAN JOSHI. 

      JUSTICE OF APPEAL, MASSATI, J.A.:; JUSTICE OF APPEAL, Makaramba, J. (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2012-02-23)
      The respondent had filed a suit in the High Court - Commercial Division, against the applicant. It was Commercial Case No. 64 of 2008. Whether or not the applicant was served is a subject of contention ...
    • HADIJA ADAM VS. GODBLESS TUMBO. 

      JUSTICE OF APPEAL, OTHMAN, C.J.: (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, ARUSHA., 2013-03-21)
      This is a preliminary objection by the Respondent, GodblessTumbo challenging the application by the Applicant, Hadija Adam lodged by notice of motion on 4/3/2010, for an extention of time within which to file an application ...
    • SHARIFA AHMED KAIDI V.S MARGRETH MASAO. 

      JUSTICE OF APPEAL, MMILLA, J.A.; JUSTICE OF APPEAL, KIMARO, J.A; JUSTICE OF APPEAL, LUANDA, J.A. (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, ARUSHA., 2013-11-25)
      Imboru Chambers, Advocates instituted Civil Application No. 6 of 2011 by way of Notice of Motion under Rules 89 (2) and 90 (a) of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009 (the Rules) on behalf of the applicant, Sharifa ...
    • OSWALD PHILIP SILWAMBA VS. TANZANIA ZAMBIA RAILWAY AUTHORITY. 

      JUSTICE OF APPEAL, MWARIJA, J.A.:; JUSTICE OF APPEAL, Shangwa, J., (IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2016-07-12)
      Upon service on it of the application, the respondent filed an affidavit in reply sworn by its advocate, Mr. Marco Mabala. Apart from the affidavit in reply, the learned counsel for the respondent filed a notice of ...
    • ECONOFINANCE COMPANY LTD (EFC) VS. ANCHOR-CLEARING AND FORWARDERS NURALI SOMJI. 

      JUSTICE OF APPEAL, ORIYO, J.A.:; JUSTICE OF APPEAL, Manento, J. (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2016-08-05)
      By way of a notice of motion made under Rules 4(2)(b),10 and 111, of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2009 (the Rules), the applicant company is moving a single judge of the Court to extend time within which to file a Record of ...
    • ECONOFINANCE COMPANY LTD (EFC) V.S ANCHOR-CLEARING AND FORWADERS AND NURALI SOMJI. 

      JUSTICE OF APPEAL, ORIYO, J.A (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2016-08-05)
      The applicant company is moving a single judge of the Court to extend the time within which to file a Record of Appeal.
    • JUDICATE RUMISHAEL SHOO & 64 OTHERS V.S THE GUARDIAN LIMITED. 

      JUSTICE OF APPEAL, LILA, J.A. (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2016-09-04)
      This is an application for an extension of time to serve the Respondent with the memorandum and record of Appeal. It is brought under Rule 10 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2009. It is brought by way of a notice of motion ...
    • LISA E. PETER VS. AL-HUSHOOM INVESTMENT. 

      JUSTICE OF APPEAL, MUSSA, J.A.:; JUSTICE OF APPEAL, Shangwa, J. (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2016-09-16)
      The genesis of the proceedings at hand is Civil Case No. 21 of 2003 which was instituted by the applicant against the respondent in the Resident Magistrates’ Court of Dar es Salaam, at Kisutu. In the suit, the applicant ...
    • SOUTH FREIGHT AND EXPORT COMPANY LTD VS. CRDB BANK LTD. 

      JUSTICE OF APPEAL, RUTAKANGWA, J.A.:; Kimaro, Mandia, J.A., J.A. (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2016-09-22)
      When this matter was called on for hearing, Dr. Saudin Mwakaje, learned advocate for the applicant, rose and boldly informed the Court that they “were aggrieved by the decision of the full Court dated 8th April, 2013”.