• 

  CATS NET LIMITED VS. TANZANIA COMMUNICATION REGULATORY AUTHORITY CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 526/01 OF 2020 

  MUGASHA, LEVIRA, J.A AND MWAMPASHI, J.A. J.A. (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2022-10-04)

  (i) The assertion on Mr. Cosatta's sickness becomes insignificant because even if it is true that he was sick to the extent of not being able to enter appearance, still he was supposed to so inform the Court before or at ...
• 

  MAIMUNA RAJABU SOKA V.S TUWAHA SAMSON MUZE CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 103/01 OF 2021 

  MWAMBEGELE, LEVIRA, J.A. And RUMANYIKA. J-A J.A (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2022-09-14)

  1. Where an Affidavit mentions another person, it will be hearsay unless there is an affidavit of that other person supporting the fact. 2. Where the intending appellant has lodged notice of appeal and failed to lodge ...
• 

  TANGA CEMENT COMPANY LIMITED V.S YAHAYA ATHUMANI MRUMA AND 4 OTHERS. 

  JUSTICE OF APPEAL, NDIKA, J. A.; JUSTICE OF APPEAL, MSUYA J.A (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, TANGA., 2017-07-12)

  The applicant applies against the respondents for extension of time within which to lodge its Written Submissions as well as for leave to lodge a supplementary affidavit in support of Civil Application No.11 of 2016.
• 

  SHARIFA AHMED KAIDI V.S MARGRETH MASAO. 

  JUSTICE OF APPEAL, MMILLA, J.A.; JUSTICE OF APPEAL, KIMARO, J.A; JUSTICE OF APPEAL, LUANDA, J.A. (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, ARUSHA., 2013-11-25)

  Imboru Chambers, Advocates instituted Civil Application No. 6 of 2011 by way of Notice of Motion under Rules 89 (2) and 90 (a) of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009 (the Rules) on behalf of the applicant, Sharifa ...
• 

  ISAWAKWE IDUWANDUMI NG'UNDA V.S JENIFER DANISTER AND DANISTER ISAKWASE. 

  JUSTICE OF APPEAL, LILA, J.A.; JUSTICE OF APPEAL, MOSHI. J. (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2017-11-09)

  The applicant seeks to move the Court under Rule 10 of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009 (the Rules) to extend the time within which to apply for revision of the proceedings, judgment, decree/order of the High court.
• 

  ANATOL PETER RWEBANGIRA VS. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENSE AND NATIONAL SERVICE AND ANOTHER. 

  JUSTICE OF APPEAL, MUGASHA, J.A.:; JUSTICE OF APPEAL, Matogolo, J. (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, BUKOBA., 2019-05-10)

  The applicant seeks to move the Court to strike out the notice of appeal against the decision of the High Court because of the respondents' failure to take some essential steps to institute an appeal within the prescribed ...
• 

  MSASANI PENINSULA HOTELS LIMITED AND 6 OTHERS VS. BARCLAYS BANK TANZANIA LIMITED AND 2 OTHERS. 

  JUSTICE OF APPEAL, NSEKELA. J.A.:; JUSTICE OF APPEAL, Luanda., J. (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2007-03-23)

  The seven applicants lodged a notice of motion under Rule 3(2) (a) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 1979 and section 4 of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act, Cap. 141 (RE 2002) .
• 

  SIMPLISIUS FELIX KIJUU ISSAKA VS. THE NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE LIMITED 

  JUSTICE OF APPEAL, KAJI, J.A.:; JUSTICE OF APPEAL, Dr. Bwana, J. (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2005-08-19)

  In this application, Simplisius Felix Kijuu Issaka,is applying for stay of execution of the decree of the High Court Commercial Division (Dr. Bwana, J.) in Commercial Case No. 175 of 2002, pending 24.3.2003 which was ...
• 

  RUSTAMALI SHIVJI KARIM MERANI VS. KAMAL BHUSHAN JOSHI. 

  JUSTICE OF APPEAL, MASSATI, J.A.:; JUSTICE OF APPEAL, Makaramba, J. (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2012-02-23)

  The respondent had filed a suit in the High Court - Commercial Division, against the applicant. It was Commercial Case No. 64 of 2008. Whether or not the applicant was served is a subject of contention ...
• 

  SANYOU SERVICE STATION LTD VS. BP TANZANIA LTD (Now PUMA ENERGY (T} LTD} 

  JUSTICE OF APPEAL, KITUSI J.A.:; JUSTICE OF APPEAL, Mgaya, J., (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2019-05-20)

  There is before me an application by Sanyou Service Station hereafter the applicant, for extension of time within which to apply for revision of the judgment and decree of the High Court in Land Case No.148 of 2005. ...
• 

  WILFRED MUGANYIZI RWAKATARE VS. HAMIS SUED KAGASHEKI AND HON. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. 

  JUSTICE OF APPEAL, MUNUO, J.A.:; JUSTICE OF APPEAL, Lila, J. (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2009-03-02)

  During the Parliamentary Elections in 2005, the present appellant, Mr. Wilfred Muganyizi Rwakatare, contested the Bukoba Urban District Constituency under the sponsorship of CUF. The first respondent, Mr. Hamisi Sued ...
• 

  THE GOVERNMENT OF THE GREAT SOCIALIST PEOPLES LIBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA & ANOTHER VS. THE HON. ATTORNEY GENERAL 

  JUSTICE OF APPEAL, KALEGEYA, J. A.:; JUSTICE OF APPEAL, Karua, J. (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA,DAR ES SALAAM., 2011-07-12)

  The said notice of motion is supported by an affidavit of Mr. Chidowu, Principal State Attorney, who also represented the Applicants during the hearing of the application.
• 

  ASHA SEIF AND 2 OTHERS VS. NADA PANGA. 

  JUSTICE OF APPEAL, MWANGESI, J.A.:; JUSTICE OF APPEAL, Mzuna, J. (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, TANGA., 2018-04-25)

  The applicants herein were the respondents in Miscellaneous Land Appeal No.6 of 2010, which was decided by the High Court in their favour in a decision that was handed down on the 30th September, 2011.The respondent ...
• 

  COMMISSIONER GENERAL(TRA) VS. PAN AFRICAN ENERGY(T) LIMITED. 

  JUSTICE OF APPEAL, LILA, J.A.:; Mwarija, Kimaro, J.A., Oriyo, J.A., J.A. (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2018-01-31)

  The Commissioner General of the Tanzania Revenue Authority, the applicant, by way of a Notice of Motion filed on 28/10/2017 under Rule 51(1) and (2) of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009, (the Rules) seeks ...
• 

  VIP ENGINEERING AND MARKETING LTD VS SGS SOCIETE GENERALE DE SURVEILLANCE SA AND SGS TANZANIA SUPERINTENDENCE COMPANY LTD. 

  JUSTICE OF APPEAL, KAJI, J. A.,; JUSTICE OF APPEAL, Kimalo, J. (IN THE MATTER OF CIVIL APPEAL NO. 65 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 105 OF 2006 ., 2006-12-18)

  By notice of motion filed under Rules 45 (1) and 82 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 1979, the applicant, V.I.P. Engineering and Court of Appeal Rules, Marketing LTD, is moving the Court for an order to ...
• 

  TANGA CEMENT COMPANY LIMITED VS. YAHAYA ATHUMANI MRUMA AND 4 OTHERS. 

  JUSTICE OF APPEAL, NDIKA, J.A.:; JUSTICE OF APPEAL, Msuya. J.: (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, TANGA.., 2017-07-12)

  By notice of motion made under rules 10, 48 (1) and (2) and 49 (2) of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009 ("the Rules''), the applicant named above applies against the respondents for extension of time within ...
• 

  TANGA CEMENT COMPANY LIMITED VS. YAHAYA ATHUMANI MRUMA AND 4 OTHERS 

  JUSTICE OF APPEAL, NDIKA, J.A.:; JUSTICE OF APPEAL, Msuya. J. (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, TANGA., 2017-07-12)
• 

  LISA E. PETER VS. AL-HUSHOOM INVESTMENT. 

  JUSTICE OF APPEAL, MUSSA, J.A.:; JUSTICE OF APPEAL, Shangwa, J. (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2016-09-16)

  The genesis of the proceedings at hand is Civil Case No. 21 of 2003 which was instituted by the applicant against the respondent in the Resident Magistrates’ Court of Dar es Salaam, at Kisutu. In the suit, the applicant ...
• 

  OSWALD PHILIP SILWAMBA VS. TANZANIA ZAMBIA RAILWAY AUTHORITY. 

  JUSTICE OF APPEAL, MWARIJA, J.A.:; JUSTICE OF APPEAL, Shangwa, J., (IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2016-07-12)

  Upon service on it of the application, the respondent filed an affidavit in reply sworn by its advocate, Mr. Marco Mabala. Apart from the affidavit in reply, the learned counsel for the respondent filed a notice of ...
• 

  NATIONAL MICROFINANCE BANK, PLC V.S COMMISIONER GENERAL, TRA. 

  JUSTICE OF APPEAL, LUANDA, J.A. (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2017-09-29)

  Before me is an application for extension of time to file an application for stay of execution from the decision of the Tax Revenue Appeals Tribunal. It has been made under Rule 10 of the Court ...

View more