John Paul Shibuda &Tanzania international Agri Input Co-Lto Applicants Vs Nordox Industries As Responoent, Civil Application No. 171 Of 2015, In The Court Of Appeal Of Tanzania At Dar Es Salaam, Pp 8-11 (Coram: Kimaro,J.A., Massati,J.A., And Mugasha,J.A.)

dc.contributor.author	Kimaro, J.A., Massati,J.A., And Mugasha,J.A.
dc.date.accessioned	2022-06-22T12:15:03Z
dc.date.available	2022-06-22T12:15:03Z
dc.date.issued	2015-11-17
dc.description.abstract	i. The Court of Appeal is not an executing Court. Modes of execution are provided for under the Civil Procedure Code. ii. Under Rule 120 (1) of the Court Rules, for any civil appeal, the appellant is required to deposit security for costs amounting to Tanzania shillings two thousand. This means that the respondent may under Rule 120(3) of the Rules request the Court to consider increasing the amount of security for costs. As long as the notice of motion requests for an .order for deposit of security for costs.	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://localhost/handle/123456789/274
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.publisher	The Court of Appeal Tanzania	en_US
dc.subject	Civil Application No. 171 OF 2015	en_US
dc.subject	Dar Es Salaam	en_US
dc.title	John Paul Shibuda &Tanzania international Agri Input Co-Lto Applicants Vs Nordox Industries As Responoent, Civil Application No. 171 Of 2015, In The Court Of Appeal Of Tanzania At Dar Es Salaam, Pp 8-11 (Coram: Kimaro,J.A., Massati,J.A., And Mugasha,J.A.)	en_US

Files

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1

Name:: FAILURE TO CITE CORRECT PROVISION, SECURITY FOR COST-JOHN PAUL SHIBUDA V. NORDOX INDUSTRIER AS.pdf
Size:: 4.25 MB
Format:: Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1