Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMWARIJA, J.A
dc.contributor.authorKEREFU, J.A
dc.contributor.authorKENTE, J.A
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-02T06:59:09Z
dc.date.available2025-04-02T06:59:09Z
dc.date.issued2014-09-17
dc.identifier.urihttps://elibrary.osg.go.tz/handle/123456789/1806
dc.description.abstractHeld: (i) The omission of drawn orders from the record of appeal violates Rule 96(1)(h) and (i) of the Court of Appeal Rules, as these orders are essential documents necessary for the determination of the appeal and must be included in the record as mandated by the Rules. (ii) The exercise of the Court's discretion under Rule 96(7) of the Rules is appropriate when it does not prejudice the parties and when it serves the interests of expeditiously determining the dispute on its merits.en_US
dc.publisherTHE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIAen_US
dc.subjectCIVIL APPEAL NO. 256 OF 2018en_US
dc.titleGURMIT SINGH v. MEET SINGH AND ANOTHER, CIVIL APPEAL NO. 256 OF 2018en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • CASE SUMMARY [55]
    Case summaries help legal practitioners, researchers, and students understand key aspects of a case without reading the full judgment.

Show simple item record