Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLILA, J.A
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-26T10:10:43Z
dc.date.available2025-03-26T10:10:43Z
dc.date.issued2018-08-29
dc.identifier.urihttps://elibrary.osg.go.tz/handle/123456789/1794
dc.description.abstractHeld: (i) A court must correctly interpret and apply saving provisions in transitional laws to ensure that pending disputes are determined by the appropriate forum with the requisite jurisdiction. (ii) In terms of paragraph 13 of the Schedule to the ELRA, the dispute was required to be dealt with in accordance with the repealed laws. The High Court made an error to nullify the proceedings and decisions of the Industrial Court and striking out Revision No. 13 of 2010 that was before it.en_US
dc.publisherTHE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIAen_US
dc.subjectCIVIL APPEAL NO. 10 OF 2020en_US
dc.titleSAIDA KAUMO v. TANZANIA TELECOMMUNICATION, CORPORATION, CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10 OF 2020en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • CASE SUMMARY [55]
    Case summaries help legal practitioners, researchers, and students understand key aspects of a case without reading the full judgment.

Show simple item record