| dc.contributor.author | ISSA, J.A | |
| dc.contributor.author | ISMAIL, J.A | |
| dc.contributor.author | MWANDAMBO, J.A | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-03-26T08:42:07Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-03-26T08:42:07Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009-10-30 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://elibrary.osg.go.tz/handle/123456789/1787 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Held: (i) A matter that has been struck out for being time-barred can only be revived through an application for an extension of time, which, if granted, allows the filing of a new appeal under a different case number. (ii) A court cannot grant reliefs that were neither pleaded in the pleadings nor prayed for by the parties, as doing so constitutes a legal irregularity. (iii) The right to be heard is a fundamental constitutional principle that safeguards against arbitrary decision-making, and any decision made without affording the affected party an opportunity to be heard violates the principles of natural justice. | en_US |
| dc.publisher | THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA | en_US |
| dc.subject | CIVIL REVISION NO. 1 OF 2020 | en_US |
| dc.title | SAID ABDALLAH DOGA v. ROSE FRIDOLINE MWAPINGA & ANOTHER, CIVIL REVISION NO. 1 OF 2020 | en_US |
