Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMAIGE, J.A
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-26T08:28:43Z
dc.date.available2025-03-26T08:28:43Z
dc.date.issued2019-05-21
dc.identifier.urihttps://elibrary.osg.go.tz/handle/123456789/1784
dc.description.abstractHeld: (i) The phrase good cause has not been defined by any written law as it cannot apply identically in all circumstances to create a legal principle and issue (ii) Judicial discretion in determining good cause should be exercised flexibly, guided by established tests but ultimately dictated by the facts and justice of each case to ensure a just and equitable decision. (iii) Aside from the justification for the delay, the Court has to consider whether the application prima facie raises some genuine questions worthy of being considered in the intended action.en_US
dc.publisherTHE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIAen_US
dc.subjectCIVIL APPLICATION NO. 620/17 OF 2021en_US
dc.titleREGISTRED TRUSTEES OF THE HEALING MINISTRY OF AGAPE INTERNATIONAL (HEMA INTERNATIONAL) v. BENNY MWANG'ONDA & 2 OTHERS, CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 620/17 OF 2021en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • CASE SUMMARY [55]
    Case summaries help legal practitioners, researchers, and students understand key aspects of a case without reading the full judgment.

Show simple item record