| dc.contributor.author | MWARIJA, J.A | |
| dc.contributor.author | KENTE, J.A | |
| dc.contributor.author | MURUKE, J.A | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-03-21T09:30:48Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-03-21T09:30:48Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-11-16 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://elibrary.osg.go.tz/handle/123456789/1780 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Held: (i) For a stay of execution to be granted under Rule 11(3) of the Court of Appeal Rules, the applicant must satisfy the Court cumulatively that: (ii) (a) Substantial loss may result if the stay is not granted; and (b) The applicant has provided security for the performance of the decree. (iii) In a system of adversarial litigation, evidence upon any factual matter must be given on oath and therefore, the practice of counsel giving evidence from the Bar is to be deprecated. | en_US |
| dc.publisher | THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA | en_US |
| dc.subject | CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 60/16 OF 2022 | en_US |
| dc.title | PRESTINE PROPERTIES LIMITED v. SEYANI BROTHERS & CO. LIMITED, CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 60/16 OF 2022 | en_US |
