| dc.contributor.author | NDIKA, J.A | |
| dc.contributor.author | RUMANYIKA, J.A | |
| dc.contributor.author | MURUKE, J.A | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-03-17T09:53:22Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-03-17T09:53:22Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023-06-05 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://elibrary.osg.go.tz/handle/123456789/1717 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Held: (i) The certificate of delay issued under rule 90(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules was invalid for a revision application. It applies only to appeals. (ii) Overriding objective principle under sections 3A and 3B of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act is for the promotion of justice it can therefore not be used to bypass mandatory procedural rules. | en_US |
| dc.publisher | THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA | en_US |
| dc.subject | CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 999/06 OF 2023 | en_US |
| dc.title | EPHRAEM CHRISTOPHER MANASE MREMA v. HOMANGE KASTORY KUNZUGALA, CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 999/06 OF 2023 | en_US |
