| dc.contributor.author | NDIKA, J.A | |
| dc.contributor.author | KAIRO, J.A | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-03-14T12:52:03Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-03-14T12:52:03Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022-03-25 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://elibrary.osg.go.tz/handle/123456789/1710 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Held:
(i) Manifest error must be a patent error on the face of the record not requiring long-drawn arguments to establish it. (ii) Review should not be utilized as a backdoor method to unsuccessful litigants to re-argue their case as review is by no means an appeal indisguise (iii) Jurisdiction, being a legal issue can be raised even on appeal. | en_US |
| dc.publisher | THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA | en_US |
| dc.subject | CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 394/01 OF 2022 | en_US |
| dc.title | PENDO FULGENCE NKWENGE v. DR. WAHIDA SHANGALI, CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 394/01 OF 2022 | en_US |
