Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCourt of Appeal of Tanzania
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-08T12:28:42Z
dc.date.available2025-02-08T12:28:42Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citation[Appellant] v. [Respondent], Civil Appeal No. 126 of 2020, Court of Appeal of Tanzania (Year of Judgment).en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://elibrary.osg.go.tz/handle/123456789/1566
dc.descriptionLegalen_US
dc.description.abstractThis case involves a dispute over the rightful ownership of a suit property following an auction sale in execution of a decree. The Court of Appeal of Tanzania set aside the High Court decision after finding that the appellant had signed a contract under questionable circumstances, including lack of legal representation and absence of compensation. The case emphasizes the principle that proof of free consent is crucial in determining contract validity.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOffice of the Solicitor General (OSG)en_US
dc.subjectLand Law – Ownership disputes, revocation of title, and land acquisition through auction.en_US
dc.subjectContract Law – Validity of agreements, free consent, and consideration in contracts. Jen_US
dc.subjectJudicial Review – Legality of government decisions affecting property rights.en_US
dc.subjectLegal Representation – The right to legal counsel in contractual agreements.en_US
dc.subjectLegal Representation – The right to legal counsel in contractual agreements.en_US
dc.titleCivil Appeal No. 126 of 2020 – Land Ownership & Contract Validityen_US
dc.title.alternativeOmary Ngatanda (State Attorney)en_US
dc.typeOtheren_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • CASE SUMMARY [55]
    Case summaries help legal practitioners, researchers, and students understand key aspects of a case without reading the full judgment.

Show simple item record