dc.contributor.author | Court of Appeal of Tanzania | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-08T12:28:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-02-08T12:28:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier.citation | [Appellant] v. [Respondent], Civil Appeal No. 126 of 2020, Court of Appeal of Tanzania (Year of Judgment). | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://elibrary.osg.go.tz/handle/123456789/1566 | |
dc.description | Legal | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This case involves a dispute over the rightful ownership of a suit property following an auction sale in execution of a decree. The Court of Appeal of Tanzania set aside the High Court decision after finding that the appellant had signed a contract under questionable circumstances, including lack of legal representation and absence of compensation. The case emphasizes the principle that proof of free consent is crucial in determining contract validity. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Office of the Solicitor General (OSG) | en_US |
dc.subject | Land Law – Ownership disputes, revocation of title, and land acquisition through auction. | en_US |
dc.subject | Contract Law – Validity of agreements, free consent, and consideration in contracts. J | en_US |
dc.subject | Judicial Review – Legality of government decisions affecting property rights. | en_US |
dc.subject | Legal Representation – The right to legal counsel in contractual agreements. | en_US |
dc.subject | Legal Representation – The right to legal counsel in contractual agreements. | en_US |
dc.title | Civil Appeal No. 126 of 2020 – Land Ownership & Contract Validity | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Omary Ngatanda (State Attorney) | en_US |
dc.type | Other | en_US |