• Login
    • LMS OPAC
    Tanzania emblem
    The United Republic of Tanzania

    Office of The Solicitor General

    eLibrary
    NDC Logo
    View Item 
    •   OSG Library Home
    • JUDGMENTS
    • Court of Appeal of Tanzania
    • Civil Procedure
    • Civil Procedure
    • View Item
    •   OSG Library Home
    • JUDGMENTS
    • Court of Appeal of Tanzania
    • Civil Procedure
    • Civil Procedure
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    ELIAS MASIJA NYANG'ORO AND 2 OTHERS VS. MWANANCHI INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITEDCIVIL APPEAL No. 278 OF 2019.

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    ELIAS MAJIJA NYANG’ORO, EDNA ELIAS NYANG’ORO AND RODRICK ELIAS NYANG’ORO VS. MWANANCHI INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED CIVIL APPEAL No. 278 OF 2019.pdf (388.2Kb)
    Date
    2022-10-19
    Author
    MKUYE, KENTE, J.A AND KIHWELO. J.A J. A.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    (i) It is, perhaps, pertinent to observe that, the law in this Country, like the Laws of other jurisdictions, recognizes, that generally the High Court may set aside an ex-parte judgment upon an application being made by an aggrieved party and upon the applicant assigning good reasons that prevented him from appearing when the matter was fixed for hearing. (ii) Therefore, the underlying factor in granting or not granting the application to set aside ex-parte order is for the applicant to demonstrate that they were prevented by good or sufficient cause to do what they were required to do by law or order of the Court. (iii) Order IX, Rule 13 (1) and (2) of the Civil Procedure Code, R.E 2002 is to ensure that parties to the suit do not sleep on their rights but rather responsibly pursue their rights in the spirit of effective case management. (iv) The exercise of discretion by the lower Court can rarely be interfered with where it is clear that the decision arrived at was a result of erroneous exercise of discretion through either omission to take into consideration relevant matters or taking into account irrelevant extraneous matters and misdirecting itself. (v) A party to a case who engages the service of an advocate, has a duty to closely follow up the progress and status of his case. (vi) The overarching policy objective behind effective case management is to ensure timely dispensation of justice which requires judicial officers to manage important steps and events in the case without occasioning injustice. (vii) Judicial officers are duty bound to ensure that cases are determined expediently, fairly and dutifully without allowing litigants who in one way or the other deliberately seek to obstruct or delay the cause of justice. To allow that will amount to abdicating our Constitutional mandate of timely dispensation of justice. It will also amount to paving way to a sure road to a grave miscarriage of justice.
    URI
    http://localhost/handle/123456789/1242
    Collections
    • Civil Procedure [20]

    OSG Copyright © 2025  LIBRARY
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     

    Browse

    All of OSG LibraryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    OSG Copyright © 2025  LIBRARY
    Contact Us | Send Feedback