• Login
    • LMS OPAC
    Tanzania emblem
    The United Republic of Tanzania

    Office of The Solicitor General

    eLibrary
    NDC Logo
    View Item 
    •   OSG Library Home
    • JUDGMENTS
    • Court of Appeal of Tanzania
    • Civil Procedure
    • Civil Procedure
    • View Item
    •   OSG Library Home
    • JUDGMENTS
    • Court of Appeal of Tanzania
    • Civil Procedure
    • Civil Procedure
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    JNM MINING SERVICES LTD VS. MINERAL ACCESS SYSTEMS TANZANIA LTD. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 395 OF 2019

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    JNM MINING SERVICES LTD v. MINERAL ACCESS SYSTEMS TANZANIA LTD CIVIL APPEAL NO. 395 OF 2019.pdf (349.5Kb)
    Date
    2022-11-07
    Author
    MKUYE. J.A.., KIHWELO. J.A. And MAKUNGU. J.A.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Held: (i)The function of the law of contract is to provide an effective and fair framework for contractual dealings and it is on that account that the function of courts is to enforce and give effect to the intention of the parties as expressed in their agreement and in the instant appeal, the intention of the parties was expressly stated in clause 5 of the consultancy services agreement which quite unfortunate was not followed by the appellant. In view of the foregoing, the first ground of appeal is misconceived and therefore is hereby dismissed. Having dismissed the first ground of appeal the Court find no need to discuss the second ground of appeal which is automatically disposed as it is directly related to ground one. (ii) The Court is alive to the time-honored principle of pleadings that each issue framed should be definitely resolved and that a judge is obliged to decide on each and every issue framed to resolve the dispute. The Court found considerable merit in the submission by the counsel for the respondent in that the learned trial Judge resolved all the issues that were framed. The Court did not accept and found the argument by the learned counsel for the appellant to be incorrect. Therefore, grounds three and four are held to be devoid of merit. They are accordingly dismissed.
    URI
    http://localhost/handle/123456789/1236
    Collections
    • Civil Procedure [20]

    OSG Copyright © 2025  LIBRARY
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     

    Browse

    All of OSG LibraryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    OSG Copyright © 2025  LIBRARY
    Contact Us | Send Feedback