• Login
    • LMS OPAC
    Tanzania emblem
    The United Republic of Tanzania

    Office of The Solicitor General

    eLibrary
    NDC Logo
    View Item 
    •   OSG Library Home
    • JUDGMENTS
    • Court of Appeal of Tanzania
    • Appeals
    • Appeals
    • View Item
    •   OSG Library Home
    • JUDGMENTS
    • Court of Appeal of Tanzania
    • Appeals
    • Appeals
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    AMIE SADICK SANGA V.S NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE LIMITED CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 105/17 OF 2021

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    39. AMIE SADICK SANGA VS. NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE LIMITED CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10517 OF 2021.pdf (262.5Kb)
    Date
    2022-09-14
    Author
    NDIKA, FIKIRINI, J.A. AND KIHWELO, J.A J.A
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    1. The courts reinforced the principle stated in the case of Barclays Bank (T) Ltd. v. Hood Transport Ltd & Another, Civil Application No. 134 of 2014 (unreported) " We need to point out that, in essence; essential steps which advance the hearing of the appeals, including a timely collection of the necessary documents which are supposed to be relied upon by the potential appellant in preparing his/her appeal, obtaining leave to appeal in those circumstances where the appeal is not of right, etc." 2. The Registrar is required to inform the appellant or a party who requested the documents when the documents are ready for collection after being served with the letter requesting documents. If the requested documents are supplied outside sixty (60) days within which the appellant ought to have lodged the intended appeal, a certificate of delay, pursuant to Rule 90 (1) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2009 as amended must be furnished to the appellant. 3. The registrar is required to prepare documents within ninety days (90) after being served with the letter requesting to be supplied with the documents as provided under Rule 90(5) of the Court of Appeal Rules. The intending appellant had the fourteen (14) days required the respondent to make a follow-up after the expiration of the period stated in 90(5). 4. The certificate of delay is issued to allow the appellant to enjoy the exception afforded under Rule 90 (1) of the Court of Appeal Rules. This exception is only applicable if the letters to the Registrar were duly served on the applicant, in compliance with Rule 90 (3) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2009 as amended.
    URI
    http://localhost/handle/123456789/1041
    Collections
    • Appeals [183]

    OSG Copyright © 2025  LIBRARY
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     

    Browse

    All of OSG LibraryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    OSG Copyright © 2025  LIBRARY
    Contact Us | Send Feedback