Search
Now showing items 1-10 of 12
BYTRADE TANZANIA LIMITED VS. ASSENGA AGROVET COMPANY LIMITED AND ANOTHER CIVIL APPEAL NO. 64 OF 2018.
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, MOSHI., 2022-10-07)
(i) The true principle of promissory estoppel is where one party has by his words or conduct made to the other a dear and unequivocal promise which is intended to create legal relations or effect a legal relationship to ...
KIBO CORRIDOR LIMITED VS. RAVJI INVESTMENTS COMPANY LIMITED CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 322/05 OF 2022.
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, MOSHI., 2022-09-23)
(i) Given the tone of the contemporary Rules of the Court, particularly rule 113 (1), an application to argue additional grounds of appeal rarely provokes resistance. More so, in the court view, when the grounds, without ...
LIFE PROMOTERS SOCIETY TANZANIA VS. HIPPOLITUS PAMPHIL NJAU. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 269/05 OF 2019
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, MOSHI., 2022-09-23)
(i) The intended appeal ought to have been lodged within sixty days from 1/10/2018 when the notice of appeal was filed. The said limitation period expired on or about 30/11/2018. Since by that time no appeal was lodged, ...
SWALEHE JUMA SANGAWE (As administrator of the Estate of the Late JUMA SWALEHE SANGAWE AND ANOTHER VS. HALIMA SWALEHE SANGAW. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 82 OF 2021.
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, MOSHI.., 2022-10-03)
HELD;
1. It is, therefore, our finding that she had no standing to institute the proceedings in the trial court.
2. The trial court obviously slipped into error by allowing her to maintain her action in her own name ...
SERENGETI BREWERIES LIMITED VS. JOSEPH MAIGE MASHAURI. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 271/05 OF 2019
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, MOSHI., 2022-09-22)
Held: (i) Conceivably, once the deposited funds are released to the respondent, they may not be easily recoverable from the respondent who is an individual with no known assets in the event that the applicant succeeds in ...
BYTRADE TANZANIA LIMITED VS. ASSENGA AGROVET COMPANY LIMITED AND ISMAIL A. MALLYA. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 64 OF 2018.
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, MOSHI., 2022-10-07)
Held:
(i) The true principle of promissory estoppel is where one party has by his words or conduct made to the other a dear and unequivocal promise which is intended to create legal relations or effect a legal relationship ...
LIFE PROMOTERS SOCIETY TANZANIA VS. HIPPOLITUS PAMPHIL NJAU. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 269/05 OF 2019
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, MOSHI., 2022-09-23)
(i) The intended appeal ought to have been lodged within sixty days from 1/10/2018 when the notice of appeal was filed. The said limitation period expired on or about 30/11/2018. Since by that time no appeal was lodged, ...
KIBOBERRY LIMITED VS. JOHN VAN DER VOORT CIVIL APPEAL NO. 248 OF 2021.
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, MOSHI., 2022-10-07)
Held:
(i) …the failure to involve the appellant in the investigation that led to the formulation of the report coupled with the omission to share a copy thereof with the respondent was a serious irregularity. Inevitably, ...
SWALEHE JUMA SANGAWE (As administrator of the Estate of the Late JUMA SWALEHE SANGAWE AND ANOTHER VS. HALIMA SWALEHE SANGAWE. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 82 OF 2021
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, MOSHI., 2022-10-03)
HELD;
1. It is, therefore, our finding that she had no standing to institute the proceedings in the trial court.
2. The trial court obviously slipped into error by allowing her to maintain her action in her own name ...
LIFE PROMOTERS SOCIETY TANZANIA VS. HIPPOLITUS PAMPHIL NJAU. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 269/05 OF 2019
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, MOSHI., 2022-09-23)
Held: (i) The intended appeal ought to have been lodged within sixty days from 1/10/2018 when the notice of appeal was filed. The said limitation period expired on or about 30/11/2018. Since by that time no appeal was ...