Search
Now showing items 1-10 of 39
MKAMA PASTORY V.S TANZANIA REVENUE AUTHORITY.
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, MWANZA., 2007-02-23)
In a ruling of the High Court at Mwanza (Mchome, J.) dated 10th March, 2005 the respondent succeeded in a preliminary objection it had raised and, as a result, the appellant’s plaint before the High Court was struck out ...
HENRY MUYAGA V.S TANZANIA TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LTD.
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, MWANZA., 2013-03-19)
The applicant was an employee of the Tanzania Telecommunications Company Ltd. (the respondent) until his services were terminated sometime in 1999. Whereupon he filed Civil Case No. 15 of 1999 in the Resident Magistrate’s ...
CAPITAL DRILLING (T) LIMITED VS. ALEX BARTHAZALI KABENDERA CIVIL APPEAL NO. 370 OF 2019
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, MWANZA., 2022-07-13)
Clearly, taking an oath before testifying is a mandatory requirement that cannot be glossed over and its omission vitiates the proceedings since it renders the evidence invalid.
MARTIN FREDRICK RAJAB VS. ILEMELA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANOTHER CIVIL APPEAL NO. 197 OF 2019.
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, MWANZA., 2022-07-18)
i) Parties are bound by their pleadings and can only succeed according to what he has averred in his plaint and proved in evidence; hence he is not allowed to set up a new case. the appellant was required to parade evidence ...
KARORI CHOGORO V.S WAITIHACHE MERENGO.
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, MWANZA., 2021-07-02)
The appellant, Karori Chogoro, lost in an action instituted against him by the respondent, Waitihache Merengo, in the District Land and Housing Tribunal for Mara at Musoma for ownership of a piece of land located at Baranga ...
METHUSELA ENOKA VS. NATIONAL MICROFINANCE BANK LTD CIVIL APPEAL No. 266 OF 2019.
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, MWANZA., 2022-07-18)
(i) Appeal is time barred but the appellantis entitled to exclusion under section 19(2) (3) of the Act without necessarily attaching any document to the memorandum of appeal.
(ii) The exclusion is automatic as long as ...
METHUSELA ENOKA VS. NATIONAL MICROFINANCE BANK LTD. CIVIL APPEAL No. 266 OF 2019.
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, MWANZA., 2022-07-18)
Held:
(i) Appeal is time barred but the appellantis entitled to exclusion under section 19(2) (3) of the Act without necessarily attaching any document to the memorandum of appeal.
(ii) The exclusion is automatic as long ...
JOVIN MTAGWABA AND 80 OTHERS V.S GEITA GOLD MINING LIMITED.
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, MWANZA., 2007-03-16)
The respondent successfully sued the applicant before the High Court at mwanza·in Civil Land Case No. 1 of 2004.
JAMES Z.. CHANILA V.S RAMADHAN MTUNDU.
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, MWANZA., 2016-10-24)
Having lost an appeal in the High Court at Mwanza, in Land Appeal No. 128 of 2013, one of the respondents there, RAMADHANI MTUNDU, (herein "the respondent") lodged a notice of appeal to this Court to express his grievances ...
GEITA GOLD MINING LTD V.S JUMANNE MTAFUNI
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, MWANZA., 2021-05-03)
The respondent successfuilv sued the appellant in the District Land and Housing Tribunal for Geita District claiming for, lnter alia, an order that he was a lawful owner of a parcel of land situate at Katoma Village, ...