Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJUSTICE OF APPEAL, KWARIKO, J.A.,
dc.contributor.authorMWARIJA. J.A., NDIKA, J.A.,
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-26T09:13:08Z
dc.date.available2022-09-26T09:13:08Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-25
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost/handle/123456789/495
dc.descriptionThat, the High Court erred in law in failing to hold that the conduct of the arbitrator in meeting the counsel for the respondent in the absence of the Appellant was in violation of rules 5 (h) and (i) of the Labour institutions (Ethics and Code of conduct for mediators and arbitrators) rules, 2007 G.N. 66 of 2007 thus amounted to misconduct.en_US
dc.description.abstractThis matter originates from the Commission for Mediation and Arbitration Mbeya (hereinafter "the CMA''). The respondent, Cresence Mwandele was employed by the appellant in the position of Regional Manager Mbeya.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTHE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, MBEYA.en_US
dc.subjectCIVIL APPEAL NO. 19 OF 2017.en_US
dc.subjectMBEYA.en_US
dc.titleBAYPORT FINANCIAL SERVICES (T) LIMITED Vs CRESENCE MWANDELE.en_US
dc.title.alternativeCIVIL APPEAL NO.19 OF 2017en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record