Review
Browse by
Recent Submissions
-
COSTANTINE VICTOR JOHN VS. MUHIMBILI NATIONAL HOSPITAL. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 188/01 OF 2021.
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2022-10-19)The said grounds one, two and four are not grounds of review envisaged under Rule 66 (1) (a) of the Rules as they require the Court to re-asses the evidence. The raised grounds do not depict an obvious or patent error ... -
ANSAAR MUSLIM YOUTH CENTRE VS. ILELA VILLAGE COUNCIL AND ANOTHER CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 310/01 OF 2021.
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2022-10-06)(i) For an application for review to succeed, the applicant must satisfy any one of the conditions stipulated under Rule 66 (1) of the Rules. It is only within the scope of that Rule that the applicant can seek the judgment ... -
RUTH MAKARANGA VS. SALUM AYUBU CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 363/17 OF 2021
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2022-09-13)1. As a general rule it is the duty of the applicant to lodge with the Court a complete record of the proceedings sought to be revised as stated in the case of Zanair Limited and Another v. Hassan & Sons Ltd, Civil Application ... -
AUSTACK ALPHONCE MUSHI VS. BANK OF AFRICA TANZANIA LTD AND ANOTHER. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 644/06 OF 2021
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, MBEYA., 2022-09-28)(i) An error on the face of the record essentially envisages a plain error that is obvious, discernible, and substantial. After the Court perusal of the notice of motion and its supporting affidavit has not been able to ...
RSS 1.0