Browsing Evidence by Subject "MWANZA."
Now showing items 1-4 of 4
-
CAPITAL DRILLING (T) LIMITED VS. ALEX BARTHAZALI KABENDERA CIVIL APPEAL NO. 370 OF 2019
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, MWANZA., 2022-07-13)Clearly, taking an oath before testifying is a mandatory requirement that cannot be glossed over and its omission vitiates the proceedings since it renders the evidence invalid. -
MHUBIRI ROGEGA MONG'ATEKO VS. MAK MEDICS LTD CIVIL APPEAL NO. 106 OF 2019.
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, MWANZA., 2022-07-19)(i) Upon admitting the liability with common understanding to repay the same, itcannot be said that such termination was un fair. (ii) It is trite law that, a document which is not admitted in evidence cannot be treated ... -
NORTH MARA GOLD MINE LIMITED VS. EMMANUEL MWITA MAGESA CIVIL APPEAL NO. 271 OF 2019.
(2022-07-18)HELD (i) An appellate court, like this one, will only interfere with concurrent findings of fact only if it is satisfied that "they are on the face of it unreasonable or perverse" leading to a miscarriage of justice, or ... -
SNV NETHERLANDS DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION TANZANIA VS. ANNE FIDELIS CIVIL APPEAL NO. 198 OF 2019.
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, MWANZA., 2022-07-13)It is mandatory for every witness who is competent to take oath or affirmation before the reception of his or her evidence in the trial court including the CMA. If such evidence is received without oath or affirmation, it ...