Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLILA, KITUSI, J.A., And MASHAKA, J.A. J.A..
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-11T08:31:08Z
dc.date.available2023-05-11T08:31:08Z
dc.date.issued2022-08-16
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost/handle/123456789/1281
dc.descriptionABBAS ALLY ATHUMAN BANTULAKI, KCB BANK TANZANIA LIMITED V. KELVIN VICTOR MAHITY (Administrator of the Estate of late PETER WALCHER COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (Lila, Kitusi, and Mashaka, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO.385 OF 2019 Probate and Administration of Estate-Administration of Estate-Administrator-Legal personal representative-registered legal personal representative Land Law-ownership-sale-ultimate good faith-good title-whether the sale of disputed land of the deceased by the legal personal representative could pass good title to other paety claiming ownership-whwther the learned trial judge’s order vesting ownership of the disputed Land to the Respondent was legally proper. (From the decision of the High Court of Tanzania at Dar es salaam, Amour, J., dated 7th December,2018 in Land Case No.116 of 2014) This is appeal originated from the High Court, whereby the respondent is a successor administrator to his late brother Erick Peter Walcher. The latter was, on 27/2/1998, appointed the administrator of the estate of his late father Peter Walcher who died intestate on 2/2/1995. Initially, Erick Peter Walcher instituted this suit against the appellants. Unfortunately, he did not survive to pursue his claims to its conclusion as he passed away before the hearing and determination of the suit. It was then when the respondent applied and was duly appointed administrator of the estate of Peter Walcher and he was inclined to amend the plaint in line with the change of administrator. Held; i. Administrator’s actions are bound to be for the benefit of the rightful heirs and are precluded from embezzling in any way misapplying the deceased estate. ii. A requirement to appoint an administrator of the estate or executor of the will of the deceased is not a luxury but is done with a purpose. iii. Legal Representative is required to apply to be registered as owner of a deceased property in the place of the deceased and upon being so registered he becomes vested with the mandate to exercise various powers stipulated including disposition. Appeal allowed. Cases referred to: 1. Joseph Shumbusho vs. Mary Grace Tigerwa and 2 others, Civil Appeal No.183 of 2016(unreported) 2. Scan Tan Tour Ltd. vs. The Catholic Diocess of Mbulu, Civil Appeal No.78 of 2012 (unreported) 3. James Funge Ngwagilo vs. Attorney General (2004) TLR 161 Statutory provision referred to: 1. Section 66 and Section 99 Mr. Elisa Abel Msuya and Ms. Regina Anthony Kiumba for the Appellants Mr. Wilson Edward Ogunde and Mr. Magusu Mugoka for the Respondent.en_US
dc.description.abstractHeld; i. Administrator’s actions are bound to be for the benefit of the rightful heirs and are precluded from embezzling in any way misapplying the deceased estate. ii. A requirement to appoint an administrator of the estate or executor of the will of the deceased is not a luxury but is done with a purpose. iii. Legal Representative is required to apply to be registered as owner of a deceased property in the place of the deceased and upon being so registered he becomes vested with the mandate to exercise various powers stipulated including disposition.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTHE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM.en_US
dc.subjectDAR ES SALAAM.en_US
dc.titleABBAS ALLY ATHUMAN BANTULAKI AND ANOTHER VS. KELVIN VICTOR MAHITY (Administrator of the Estate of the late PETER WALCHER)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 385 OF 2019.en_US
dc.title.alternativeCIVIL APPEAL NO. 385 OF 2019en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record