Now showing items 558-577 of 1080

    • M BARA LA A. MAHARAGANDE AND 4 OTHERS VS. MAHIKU A. MAHARAGANDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 469/01 OF 2021 

      KEREFU, J.A (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2021-10-12)
      1. The applicant must lodge the application within fourteen days from the date that he was served with the notice of execution or from when he became aware of the execution proceedings in terms of rule 11 (4) of the Court ...
    • M/S GEORGES CENTRE LIMITED VS. THE HONOURABLE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND M/S. TANZANIA NATIONAL ROAD AGENCY. 

      JUSTICE OF APPEAL, KILEO, J.A.; RUTAKANGWA, MASSATI, J.A. J.A (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, ARUSHA., 2016-07-25)
      This appeal is predicated on a procedural issue that was raised suo motu by the Court at the hearing of the appeal. For this reason, there will be no need for us to go into a consideration of the grounds of appeal that ...
    • M/S MAJEMBE AUCTION MART VS. CHARLES KABERUKA 

      JUSTICE OF APPEAL, LUBUVA, J.A.:; JUSTICE OF APPEAL, MROSO, J.A., RUTAKANGWA, J.A. (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, MWANZA., 2007-02-23)
      When the appeal was called on for hearing, Mr. Galati, learned counsel for Charles Kaberuka, the respondent, submitted on the preliminary objection, notice of which had duly been given in terms of the provisions of rule ...
    • M/S ROKO INVESTMENT CO. LTD TANZANIA ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. LTD CIVIL APPEAL NO. 327 OF 2019 

      KOROSSO. J.A., GALEBA, J.A. AND MWAMPASHI, J.A (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, TABORA., 2022-11-09)
      : (i) First and foremost, it is our observation that, the suit by the Respondent which is for the recovery of electricity charges amounting to TZS. 84,160,612.93, was properly brought under summary procedure. Under ...
    • M/S ROKO INVESTMENT CO. LTD VS.TANZANIA ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. LTD CIVIL APPEAL NO. 327 OF 2019. 

      KOROSSO. J.A., GALEBA, J.A. AND MWAMPASHI, J.A (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, TABORA., 2022-11-09)
      (i) First and foremost, it is our observation that, the suit by the Respondent which is for the recovery of electricity charges amounting to TZS. 84,160,612.93, was properly brought under summary procedure. Under Order ...
    • M/S SOPA MANAGEMENT LIMITED VS. M/S TANZANIA REVENUE AUTHORITY. 

      JUSTICE OF APPEAL, MUNUO, J.A.:; JUSTICE OF APPEAL, KILEO, J.A., MANDIA, J.A. (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, ARUSHA., 2012-03-05)
      On the 26th September, 2000,the High Court of Tanzania, Mushi J. struck out Civil Case No. 22 of 1998 with costs for lack of jurisdiction to determine matters relating to hotel levy,sales tax, stamp duty and car benefit ...
    • Madam Mary Silvanus Qoro vs. Edith Donath Kweka & Another, Civil Appeal No. 106 of 2016 

      MWANGESI, J.A., NDIKA, J.A., And KITUSI, J.A. (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, 2019-04-04)
      Issue of locust stand in Civil cases Applicability of principle of adverse possession/ long use and the cherished principle of civil litigation that parties are bound by their pleadings. Procedure for transfer of the ...
    • MAFUNGO LEONARD MAJURA AND 14 OTHERS V.S TANESCO LIMITED. 

      JUSTICE OF APPEAL, WAMBALI. J.A.; LILA, KOROSSO, J.A. J.A (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2020-11-27)
      The fifteen applicants listed above sued Tanzania Electric Supply Company Limited (TANESCO) in Land Case No.55 of 2008 before the High Court of Tanzania (Land Division) at Dar es Salaam. In that suit the applicants claimed ...
    • THE MAGISTRATES’ COURTS (KINONDONI DISTRICT COURT) (CONCURRENT JURISDICTION OVER UBUNGO DISTRICT) (REVOCATION) ORDER,GN: NO. 378 OF 2024 

      JUMA, IBRAHIM HAMISI (GOVERNMENT PRINTER DODOMA, 2024-05-17)
      This Order may be cited as the Magistrates’ Courts This Order may be cited as the Magistrates’ (Kinondoni District Court) (Concurrent Jurisdiction Over Ubungo District) (Revocation) Order, 2024.
    • Magistrates’ Courts Act (CAP. 11 R.E. 2019) 

      CHAPTER 11 (Government Printer, 2019)
      An Act to provide for the jurisdiction, powers, and functions of magistrates’ courts and for other related matters.
    • MAGNUS K. LAUREAN V.S TANZANIA BREWERIES LIMITED. 

      JUSTICE OF APPEAL, NDIKA J.A; GALEBA, MWAMPASHI, J.A J.A (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2021-10-08)
      The appellant, Magnus K. Laurean, contests the decision of the High Court of Tanzania, Labour Division at Dar es Salaam (Nyerere, J.) dated 22nd September, 2017 in Revision No. 283 of 2016. In that decision, the High Court ...
    • MAGRETH MKIMA V.S SAADA BAKARI. 

      JUSTICE OF APPEAL, JUMA, J.A; OTHMAN, MWARIJA, J.A. J.A. (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2016-09-08)
      In a judgment delivered on 15th October 2009, Wambura, J. dismissed an appeal, Civil Appeal No. 140 of 2008, which the respondent SAADA BAKARI had filed against the applicant MAGRETH MKIMA. The scant background facts ...
    • MAHIKU A. MAHARAGANDE V.S NYAMUHIKA A. MAHARAGANDE 

      JUSTICE OF APPEAL, SEHEL, J.A; MWANGESI, NDIKA J.A J.A (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2020-11-09)
      The applicant through the services of Mr. Fulgence Massawe, learned advocate filed a Notice of Motion under Rule 89 (2) of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules 2009 ("the Rules) seeking an order of the Court that the notice ...
    • MAIMUNA RAJABU SOKA V.S TUWAHA SAMSON MUZE CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 103/01 OF 2021 

      MWAMBEGELE, LEVIRA, J.A. And RUMANYIKA. J.A. J.A (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2022-09-02)
      1.Where an Affidavit mentions another person, it will be hearsay unless there is an affidavit of that other person supporting the fact. 2.Where the intending appellant has lodged notice of appeal and failed to lodge an ...
    • MAIMUNA RAJABU SOKA V.S TUWAHA SAMSON MUZE CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 103/01 OF 2021 

      MWAMBEGELE, LEVIRA, J.A. And RUMANYIKA. J-A J.A (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2022-09-14)
      1. Where an Affidavit mentions another person, it will be hearsay unless there is an affidavit of that other person supporting the fact. 2. Where the intending appellant has lodged notice of appeal and failed to lodge ...
    • MAKOMOLWA MATEPELI SHIJA V.S MWANAHAMISI ALLY NONGWA Representative of KIDAWA SEIF. 

      JUSTICE OF APPEAL, MWANGESI, J.A.; MWARIJA, KWARIKO, J.A. J.A. (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2019-06-21)
      This ruling is in respect of preliminary objection which has been raised by the respondent to the appeal that has been preferred by the appellant to challenge the judgment and decree of the high court in land.
    • MAKOMOLWA MATEPELI SHIJA V.S MWANAHAMISI ALLY NONGWA (Legal Representative of KIDAWA SElF (deceased) 

      JUSTICE OF APPEAL, MWANGESI, J.A.; MWARIJA, KWARIKO, J.A. J.A (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2019-06-21)
      This ruling is in respect of preliminary objection which has been raised by the respondent to the appeal that has been preferred by the appellant to challenge the judgment and decree of the High Court in Land Case No. 155 of 2010.
    • MALMO MONTAGEKONSULT AB TANZANIA BRANCH V.S MARGARET GAMA. 

      JUSTICE OF APPEAL, MROSO, J.A; NSEKELA, RUTAKANGWA, J.A. J.A. (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2007-06-11)
      This is a second appeal in a case that originated in the Court of Resident Magistrates, at Dar es Salaam. In the trial court the appellant was the plaintiff and the respondent was the defendant. The appellant was the ...
    • MARIAM IDD (As Administratrix of the Estate of the late MBARAKA OMARI) V.S ABDULRAZACK OMARY LAIZER (As Administrator of the Estate of the late ABUBAKAR OMARI AND ANOTHER. 

      JUSTICE OF APPEAL, KAIJAGE, J.A; ORIYO, MUSSA, J.A. J.A (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, ARUSHA., 2013-06-17)
      At the centre of controversy between the parties herein are premises on Plot No. 5, Block ‘E’, Area ‘F’ registered under L.O No. 23952 situated within Arusha City.
    • MARTIN FREDRICK RAJAB VS. ILEMELA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANOTHER CIVIL APPEAL NO. 197 OF 2019. 

      MUGASHA, KEREFU, J.A. And KIHWELO. J.A. J.A. (THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, MWANZA., 2022-07-18)
      i) Parties are bound by their pleadings and can only succeed according to what he has averred in his plaint and proved in evidence; hence he is not allowed to set up a new case. the appellant was required to parade evidence ...